Why Making MRSA Testing Mandatory Might Improve Public Health
May 5th, 2011 by Aldouspi

Why Making MRSA Testing Mandatory Might Improve Public Health

MRSA Testing

MRSA is a severe bacterial infection that is resistant to some of the most popularly used antibiotics. Left untreated, it can cause dangerous infections all over in the body, and can even lead to death. Some hospitals are considering make testing for MRSA, a prerequisite to being admitted.

The Veterans Health Administration hospital in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania checks a nasal swab for MRSA. Patients that test positive for the bacteria are then placed in isolation for their stay. The hospital subsequently saw a reduction in the number of MRSA infections by fifty percent, going from one case per thousand days of patient care to one case per 2000 days. The belief is that if more hospitals follow suit, then overall the cases of MRSA infections will be fewer and easier to treat.

The hospitals that have started screening, feel that it is a good safety initiative, and helps to improve the quality of patient care. These programs come at a time when the number of MRSA infections is on the rise. In 1974, only two percent of staph infections were MRSA. This number increased to 22% in 1995 and a whopping 63% in 2004. The CDC estimates that approximately 126,000 patients are infected each year, with about 5,000 of those resulting in death.

Besides the risk to patients, MRSA costs billions of extra dollars in health care costs each year. New, faster tests may make it easier to identify MRSA and take appropriate action when patients are admitted.

It is thought that many hospital infections could have been prevented. In the long run, this could mean that testing for MRSA could end up saving the hospitals money, as well as reduce lawsuits, by decreasing the number of infections.

However, not everyone feels that universal MRSA screening is the best answer to the problem. Those against universal screening feel that there is not enough evidence to prove that universal screening is sufficient to reduce the number of MRSA cases. They say that the research done so far has been in response to MRSA outbreak situations, instead of randomized, controlled trials. Government-funded randomized trials suggests that screening and contact precautions alone is not enough to lower the rate of infections.

Another concern with some doctors is that patients in isolation may not get the same attention from doctors and nurses because of fear of contagions. This can lead to other health problems from neglect, including risk of falls or pressure ulcers. Some patients may also suffer from mental health issues like depression or anxiety because of the isolation.

Others feel that the focus should be on proper hand washing and infection control procedures, instead of merely screening and isolating patients. Even in isolation, there is no guarantee that staff will follow procedures every single time, without the proper training, which will increase the risk of cross contamination between patients.

Further investigation of MRSA testing and its affects on the number of infections, will have to be done, in order to determine the most effective course towards preventing the disease.


[phpbay]MRSA, 6, “”, “”[/phpbay]


Why Making MRSA Testing Mandatory Might Improve Public Health related articles from the blogosphere…

Screening Hemodialysis Patients for MRSA Cost Effective

The Economic Value of Screening Hemodialysis Patients for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the United States – Lee – Clinical Microbiology and Infection – Wiley Online Library. We constructed a Markov computer …

Publish Date: 04/21/2011 0:01

http://tahilla.typepad.com/mrsawatch/2011/04/screening-hemodialysis-patients-for-mrsa-cost-effective.html

I have MRSA…should my pet be tested? : Worms and Germs Blog

Also, the test only tells you the status of the pet at the time of sampling. It could have picked up MRSA five minutes after the swabs were taken. So, a negative result means the animal is probably negative. Since it’s not absolutely …

Publish Date: 03/23/2011 15:12

http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2011/03/articles/animals/cats/i-have-mrsashould-my-pet-be-tested/

Medtech Business – MRSA home testing kit launched in UK

A new home screening kit will enable people in the UK to test themselves for MRSA bacteria at home. The Blue Horizon Medicals MRSA Home Screening Test Kit contains swab equipment for return to a lab…

Publish Date: 05/04/2010 9:34

http://www.medtechbusiness.com/news/2010/05/mrsa-home-testing-kit-launched-in-uk


MRSA Testing In ICU at Riverside

Riverside starting study to see who is carrying MRSA bug in the ICU. A special machine provides results in two hours. They are trying to track the spread of the bug and trying to decrease the infection rate in the hospital.

Possibly related posts:





Some of the links in the post above are “affiliate links.” This means if you click on the link and purchase the item, we will receive an affiliate commission. Regardless, we only recommend products or services we believe will add value to our readers.

Comments are closed

SIDEBAR
»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
Copyright Healthyhuman.net | Privacy Policy | Disclosure Policy »  Substance: WordPress   »  Style: Ahren Ahimsa